Comments on: Mel Gibson Talks About Racist Comment With Danny Glover

By: Abdullah The Butcher

Abdullah The Butcher — Mon, 24 Jan 2011 11:59:58 +0000

I always make sure to use the correct terms when talking about niggers, wetbacks, chinks, gooks, japs, wops, dagos, frogs, buck-tooth limey’s, homoqueers, lesboqueers, homotransqueersexuals, and all other diverse types of infidels.

I hate all those heathen bastards….but I do not wish to cause them esteem issues.

Eat shit and die infidels.

ALLAHU AKBAR

Like or Dislike: 0 0

By: Citstiny-online

Citstiny-online — Mon, 24 Jan 2011 04:34:24 +0000

Taname huvitavat teavet

Like or Dislike: 0 0

By: ralph

ralph — Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:53:33 +0000

CARLITA Speaks for herself when she “STATES” that All white people hate Black people . If there is any hate involved it usually has to do with the individuals Attitude not skin color

Like or Dislike: 1 0

By: cd

cd — Thu, 16 Sep 2010 19:55:46 +0000

so I hate my wife?

idiot

Like or Dislike: 2 2

By: Susan (Queen Mab)

Susan (Queen Mab) — Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:27:49 +0000

Bravo! It’s about time there was at least one person who thinks for theirselves and isn’t so ready to believe everything they hear from the newspapers. If anyone really wants the truth, it’s Mel’s father who is the racist and biggot not Mel! Mel has been at odds with his father ever since he made the Lethal Weapon films with Danny Glover and also with Joe Pesci ( who is an italian jew!) Plus, if anyone really knows anything about some of the more obscure facts of history when Mel portrayed William Wallace in “Braveheart” there were things he did that I believe to be his own personal display of rebellion against his catholic upbringing. First of all there were scenes where he wore the old garb of the Picts often referred to as Woads! He and many of the other warriors also wore the blue woad during battles and often weren’t wearing the usual clansmen garb! This was not only rebellion against the current King of England, but it was anti-catholic and roman in that the garb and paint were worn by the pagans of the British Isles who fought against the occupation of the Holy Roman Empire under the emperor Hadrian!

Add on the fact that he wrote and starred in “What Women Want” with Helen Hunt as a statement against the sexism that has plagued the world not only from catholics, but every where else! Plus, I have “Apocalypto” which I thought was excellent where he actually worked with native American actors. Mel also doesn’t put down other religions, in fact while filming the Patriot he was around the Amish communities and the Amish loved him! He was very respectful of their ways and he even attended a few prayer services with them! I wish Mel and so many like him just would be more careful about the kind of people they hook up with! It’s pretty bad when you have fame and money, but never really experience what real love is like!

Pass this information on to others you might hear talking trash about Mel! Keep up the good work! Thanks, Suzette

Like or Dislike: 1 1

By: bystander

bystander — Fri, 13 Aug 2010 07:34:15 +0000

That’s just Mel being Mel. Take it as a joke and laugh it off. He’s not really racist, he was going for effect, and he’s not misogynist, again, it was for effect….the poor guy is Manic depressive and needs some serious meds that he is simply and obviously not getting, no more and no less. He’s broken, folks, and he needs to be mended rather than ridiculed or hated…this is the truth for those who are in the know…

Peace.

Like or Dislike: 2 0

By: selena gomez is way better than miley slutrus

selena gomez is way better than miley slutrus — Tue, 03 Aug 2010 22:34:39 +0000

amen

Like or Dislike: 0 0

By: jessi

jessi — Tue, 03 Aug 2010 19:33:17 +0000

If Mel gibson was really racist he would not work with such a diverse group of people by his on volition.
Take apocalypto for instance. If he was truly racist against “wettbacks” he would not have wanted so badly to do a movie about them. Or at least, about many of their ancestors. And he would have cast primarily white people for the jobs.
People need to stop and think just a tiny bit before labeling him a complete racist.
A real racist attempts to avoid that which they hate AS MUCH as possible.

You won’t see a leader in the KKK applying for a position at a dominantly black McDonald’s in the ghetto.

Like or Dislike: 1 0

By: jacob

jacob — Mon, 02 Aug 2010 16:55:45 +0000

That is the most ignorant and uneducated comment I have ever read online. I hope you do not have children.

Like or Dislike: 3 2

By: nsight

nsight — Sun, 01 Aug 2010 15:09:02 +0000

lets be clear… what was said may not have been politically correct, but then again, how many of us are anyway. Its evident his day was going ill as his marriage. I heard it on tv and clearly it sounded of a man whom was hysterical, afraid, frustrated and angry amongst it all. It almost had the air of one of the few individuals or of the last he personally new and trusted betrayed and twisted on him and he lashed out in an effort to find his emotional barrings within this woman. He wanted her reaction, so he aimed to receive it. People have lost complete focus of what he was trying to get across, which had nothing to do with racism whatsoever. He was angry with this lady. The media only revealed those parts of which they wanted to be seen. I can say that on, T.V. what he said sounded like him, from what she said it sounded like it was either dubbed over or she was sadistically calm amongst his paranoid state of hysteria. Which makes me think she is in question. Are you politically correct when you are angry? If so, how about your thoughts? But if you stick to the point, the point is evident, he was not in a normal state of mind. This was a mentally broken individual in a most vulnerable state, trying to get the intensity of that internal conflict out, which had nothing to do with racism. All of these individuals whom are successful and under the constant spotlight, are in affiliations/fraternities with some powerful people and when they do not comply things happen. For instance look at Tiger Woods… Instead of questioning his nature, choices or actions, would you not concentrate the focus of the question that someone of which contains this social status would not have been caught far sooner? OF COURSE HE WOULD HAVE, the reason he did not is because there was someone there covering his trail, but tiger did not come through or denied something expected of him and there are penalties for his actions. All of a sudden no Names came out of the woodwork to stone his reputation. Though I cannot condone what he had done, I do not believe he changed at all. The only thing that has changed is what the media has chosen to put in front of you. The media, the news, etc. is all regulated. A citizen is a sleeping sheep.

So, In this case, this is Mel, under mass amounts of stress flipping out. He more than likely does not have a personal issue with African Americans. Rather the intention of his statement was to provoke his state of anxiety onto his opposing wife, so she could understand his state of pain. Think about it, that issue surfaced and now it is GONE. No one will care tomorrow really if it is not in the media, we are too oblivious to the daily wars and child workshops occuring in the world.

Things are not always what they seem, do not be deceived or so readily eat the falsehoods placed before your face. In order to truly understand the situation of where he stands more information must be acquired. Nor does it prove justice to judge, more less wonder what has caused a man to lose himself in that way first. He did not sound as an offender but someone on the defense hence his reaction in last plea to read, “DON’T DO IT, I AM STILL A FORCE BE RECKONED.”

trying to protect himself. The media has the worlds minds so warped on whatever it shows and fixates versus what is really going on.

Like or Dislike: 3 1